Hot News
Quadre Investments LP v. Yichen Zhang
Muskoka Blue Ltd : Restoration Application
BUA International Ltd v. Domtec International LLC
Julie Greenberg v. Rupert Murdoch: Complaint
Marco Ohlin v. Unidentified Individuals

Crime, Corruption & Politics

Donate
Search
  • Home
  • Intel
  • More
Reading: Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.
Share
Aa
Arab InsiderArab Insider
Search
  • Home
  • Categories
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Forums
    • Complaint
    • Sitemap
Follow US
Made by ThemeRuby using the Foxiz theme. Powered by WordPress
Arab Insider > Latest News > Intel > Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.
Intel

Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.

By Brian Walcott March 25, 2023 7 Min Read
Share
Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.
Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Claims leveled against the crowd1
  • Philippines’ indefinite prohibition on using Crowd1
  • Consequences of the prohibition

Introduction

Crowd1 is a corporation that promises to be able to give individuals a platform via which they may invest in a variety of sectors, including gaming, education, and real estate. Unfortunately, the firm has been the subject of several accusations of fraud, and as a result, it is illegal in a number of nations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the Philippines has decided to permanently prohibit Crowd1 beginning in the year 2020 because of allegations of fraudulent conduct. In this article, we will investigate the claims that have been made against Crowd1, as well as the permanent ban that the Philippines has placed on the corporation, and the repercussions of the restriction.

Contents
IntroductionClaims leveled against the crowd1Philippines’ indefinite prohibition on using Crowd1Consequences of the prohibition

Claims leveled against the crowd1

Crowd1 has been the subject of multiple accusations of fraudulent activity in a variety of nations. Yet, there are some suspicions that the organization is really functioning as a pyramid scam, despite the fact that the company promises to offer a platform for individuals to invest in numerous sectors. Participants in a pyramid scheme get the majority of their income from recruiting new members into the plan rather than from engaging in lawful commercial activity.

The fact that Crowd1 seems to be more concerned with acquiring new members than it is with offering genuine investment possibilities is one of the key reasons for caution about this platform. Nevertheless, there is not much proof to back up the firm’s claims that it has relationships with a variety of companies operating in diverse fields, despite the fact that the corporation makes these claims. However, it seems as if the company’s primary emphasis is on acquiring new members and promoting the purchase of membership packages.

One further thing that raises red flags with Crowd1 is the fact that the company’s remuneration scheme is predicated almost entirely on bringing in new members. Pyramid systems often have the common feature of allowing participants to earn commissions according to the number of individuals they bring into the plan. In addition, the membership packages offered by the firm are rather pricey, with some of them going up to a maximum of $2,500.

Crowd 1: The Philippines puts a permanent ban.

Philippines’ indefinite prohibition on using Crowd1

The Securities and Exchange Commission in the Philippines issued an indefinite cease-and-desist order against Crowd1 in August 2020. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made allegations that Crowd1 was functioning as a pyramid scheme and was engaged in fraudulent activity. Because of the restriction, Crowd1 is not permitted to make available to the general public in the Philippines any securities or investment contracts.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made the decision in June 2020 to issue a stop-and-desist order against the firm, which led to the SEC’s subsequent decision to permanently prohibit Crowd1. The injunction directed Crowd1 to cease recruiting new members and to stop offering investment contracts inside the nation. Notwithstanding this, the corporation conducted business as usual, which resulted in the SEC issuing a permanent ban.

Consequences of the prohibition

The indefinite prohibition of Crowd1 in the Philippines has enormous repercussions for both the firm and the individuals who are a part of it. The prohibition forbids Crowd1 from selling investment contracts or recruiting new members, which basically puts an end to the company’s business activities in the nation.

As a result of the prohibition, members of Crowd1 will no longer be allowed to take part in any of the activities that are being conducted by the firm in the Philippines. Moreover, this casts doubt on the legality of the activities carried out by the corporation in the aforementioned other nations. If there is evidence that Crowd1 is involved in fraudulent operations in one area, it is conceivable that the same actions are also taking place in other countries.

The prohibition also serves as a warning to other businesses that could be running pyramid schemes or engaging in fraudulent operations. It is clear that the SEC takes claims of fraud seriously and is prepared to take action against organizations that participate in such activities since it has decided to permanently ban Crowd1.

What kind of lessons may investors take away from this?

The permanent prohibition on Crowd1 in the Philippines serves as a cautionary tale for investors, telling them to exercise extreme caution whenever they are contemplating prospects for investment. When putting money into any firm, investors should do their homework and be aware of establishments that guarantee huge returns with less exposure to risk.

Investors should also exercise caution when dealing with businesses that place a significant emphasis on the recruitment of new members. It is unlawful in many countries to operate a pyramid scheme, and investors are not likely to see profits that are sustainable if they do. Instead, investors should concentrate on real investment possibilities that have a history of being profitable and are open and honest about how they conduct their business.

In addition, investors should be aware of the dangers connected with putting their money into businesses that have operations in more than one nation. It is possible that something that is lawful in one nation may not be lawful in another nation since regulations and laws differ from nation to nation. It is important for investors to do research on the regulatory climate in each nation.

You may also like The Pro Trade Club is a trading platform that costs $297 a month to join.

You Might Also Like

Quadre Investments LP v. Yichen Zhang

Muskoka Blue Ltd : Restoration Application

BUA International Ltd v. Domtec International LLC

Julie Greenberg v. Rupert Murdoch: Complaint

Marco Ohlin v. Unidentified Individuals

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Brian Walcott March 25, 2023
Share This Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Quadre Investments LP
Quadre Investments LP v. Yichen Zhang
Muskoka Blue Ltd
Muskoka Blue Ltd : Restoration Application
BUA International Ltd v. Domtec International LLC
BUA International Ltd v. Domtec International LLC
Julie Greenberg v. Rupert Murdoch
Julie Greenberg v. Rupert Murdoch: Complaint
Marco Ohlin v. Unidentified Individuals
Marco Ohlin v. Unidentified Individuals

Stay Connected

235.3k Followers Like
69.1k Followers Follow
56.4k Followers Follow
136k Subscribers Subscribe

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Quadre Investments LP v. Yichen Zhang

A motion by Quadre Investments L.P. to compel Yichen Zhang to produce documents for use in an "appraisal proceeding" in…

Intel
May 8, 2023

Muskoka Blue Ltd : Restoration Application

According to publicly available records, Muskoka Blue Ltd. has submitted a restoration application. No other information is given.

Intel
May 8, 2023

BUA International Ltd v. Domtec International LLC

U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, Respondents BUA International Limited (Nigeria) and NOM (UK) Ltd. (England) Petition to…

Intel
May 8, 2023

Julie Greenberg v. Rupert Murdoch: Complaint

Julie Greenberg Stockholder Derivative Complaint filed in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware against K. Rupert Murdoch,…

Intel
May 8, 2023

We investigate and bring topics to light that often go under-reported in the Middle East. Arab Insider delivers accurate and impartial information for you.

 

  • Home
  • About
  • Latest News
  • Contribute
  • Intel
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Contact

Follow US: 

Arab Insider

  1. Diplomat Tower,  West bay, Zone 60, Street 836, Building140, Doha, Qatar 
  2. Tel: +974-4445300

 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?