Table of Contents
Compcoin, a cryptocurrency that was touted as an investment option for anyone who wished to become engaged in the cryptocurrency industry, was founded by Alan Friedland, who also serves as the company’s Chief Executive Officer. After allegations made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that Friedland had defrauded investors via the sale of Compcoin, Friedland reached a settlement with the SEC in the amount of $1.8 million in 2019. In this article, we will talk about the fraud settlement involving Compcoin and its consequences for the cryptocurrency sector.
What exactly is a Compcoin?
Alan Friedland and his business, Digital Markets, are responsible for the development of the cryptocurrency known as Compcoin. Compcoin was sold as a method for investors to participate in the cryptocurrency market without having to acquire and sell genuine cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum. This was touted as a way for investors to become engaged in the cryptocurrency market more easily.
Friedland claims that the primary purposes for which Compcoin was conceived were those of a medium for storing wealth and of providing a mechanism for investors to generate profits through a specialized trading algorithm. Friedland said that the algorithm was able to provide continuous rewards for investors and that the value of Compcoin would rise over time as more people started to use it. He also predicted that Compcoin would gain in value.
The accusations made by the SEC against Friedland
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made public in June 2019 that it had reached a settlement with Alan Friedland on claims that he had fraudulently induced investors to purchase Compcoin. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said that Friedland had engaged in fraudulent activity in order to sell investors Compcoin and that he had made false and misleading representations regarding the cryptocurrency.
According to the lawsuit filed by the SEC, Friedland had provided investors with a series of representations concerning Compcoin that were both false and deceptive. For instance, he said that the currency was supported by a group of financial professionals and that it had been audited by an independent accounting company. He also stated that this assertion was true. In point of fact, however, these assertions were not only untrue but there was also no proof to back them up.
In addition to this, the SEC claimed that Friedland had deceived investors in order to make a sale of Compcoin. The regulatory body said that Friedland had promoted the money via the use of a network of sales agents and that he had given these sales agents inaccurate and deceptive information about the value and prospective returns of the currency.
The agreement reached between Friedland and the SEC
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said in August 2019, only a few months after it had filed its lawsuit against Friedland, that it had reached a settlement with the CEO for the amount of $1.8 million. Friedland agreed to pay $1.8 million in disgorgement and civil penalties as part of the settlement, and he was also prohibited from serving as an officer or director of any public corporation in the future. The specifics of the settlement can be seen here.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated, in a statement, that “Compcoin was presented as a digital investment opportunity by Friedland and his firm, but in fact, it was nothing more than a fake investment scam. Compcoin was promoted as an investment opportunity. We will continue to pursue legal action against individuals who aim to deceive investors, and we will endeavor to ensure that investors are protected from fraudulent schemes such as the one described above.”
Consequences for the fields of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology
The settlement reached over the Compcoin scam has a number of repercussions for the cryptocurrency sector. In the first place, it demonstrates how important it is for authorities that oversee the bitcoin industry to exercise extreme caution. Investing in cryptocurrencies such as Compcoin carries a high degree of potential risk due to the lack of regulation that governs the cryptocurrency industry as a whole.
Second, the settlement illustrates that the SEC is ready to take legal action against those individuals who participate in fraudulent activities in the bitcoin market. The agency has been more active in investigating and prosecuting fraud in the cryptocurrency business, and the settlement with Friedland is only one example of this trend. The agency has also been investigating and prosecuting fraud in other industries, including the securities industry.
In conclusion, the settlement highlights how important investor education is in the bitcoin industry. Because of the possibility of big returns, a lot of people are interested in cryptocurrencies, but it’s possible that they don’t completely comprehend the dangers that come along with investing in these kinds of assets. As a result of this, it is essential for investors to educate themselves on the possible benefits and dangers of investing in cryptocurrencies and to proceed with extreme care while doing so.
You may also like: Switzerland issues warning about Paraiba World securities fraud